This is the sad tale of my cousin Harry
Robertson Sproule, a story that I still find thought provoking.
My great, great uncle Samuel
Sproule, former First Member of the Medical Board of Bombay, had spent some thirty
years working in India. When he left
India in 1827 he settled in Cheltenham, England, home of so many retired East
India Company folk that it became known as the city of Colonels and Curries!
Samuel brought with him from India his wife Eliza, their only child Ann Jane and his ‘reputed son’ Harry Robertson Sproule. Harry was his illegitimate son and Samuel had taken him into his family.
Eurasian Children in the East India Company Culture
Samuel Sproule was from Ireland where, in the
1800s, having a child out of wedlock was condemned. However, in the East India Company culture of
that time, it seems that having a ‘reputed child’ with a local Indian lady was
quite acceptable. In its early days, the East India Company
actively encouraged Anglo-Indian liaisons and marriages. Surprisingly, inter-racial
marriages were socially acceptable to the British, and the offspring, official or otherwise,
were favoured by them. I wonder if the same could be said of the Indian culture? How did they view these relationships?
This was the situation when Samuel arrived in Bombay, India, in 1797. So it is likely, but of course not certain, that Harry’s mother was an Indian lady.
Harry Robertson Sproule
Harry Robertson
Sproule was born on 25th September 1809, nine years before Samuel
married his wife Eliza. Harry was baptised in Bombay five years later, on 30th December 1814 and Samuel Sproule is the only parent named on the baptism
certificate.
Bhema, the Indian Lady in the Will
Samuel wrote the first draft of his
will on 30th of January 1828 when Harry was 18 years old. He tells us that Harry is now living with him in Cheltenham in England. There is no mention of Harry’s mother in
the will. However, Samuel does leave a bequest to an Indian lady:
“The sum of
twenty five rupees a month to be paid during her life to a Native Woman of
India by name Bhema now residing at Surat”
Samuel does not give an address
for Bhema, a way to contact her regarding her inheritance. We can assume, therefore, that either the Executors knew this lady or that Bhema was
indeed Harry’s mother, and he would know how to find her. Bhema was living in Surat near Bombay, and Samuel was stationed there for some time. Was Bhema Harry's mother, or could she have been simply his long-term housekeeper?
Harry’s Inheritance
In his will, Samuel leaves a trust fund
of £2000 to his 'reputed son' Harry Robertson Sproule. This is a large sum of
money, and Harry is to receive the interest on this annually during his
lifetime. Samuel leaves the bulk of the estate to his only legitimate child,
Ann Jane, who was only nine years old at the time of the will. However, he
states that should Ann Jane die before the age of 21 or without issue, his
estate is to go to the eldest son of Harry Robertson Sproule.
Samuel obviously sees
Harry as his second heir. However, why leave the money to Harry’s son and not
to Harry himself? Harry was just 18 years old at this time. It could well be
that Samuel was already having doubts about his reputed son Harry.
The Codicils to the Will
During the period
between the first writing of the will in 1828 and his death in 1829, Samuel
added two codicils to his will that concerned Harry. In the first of these, there are indications that poor Harry is not excelling in the
English education system:
“I intended my
reputed son Harry Robertson Sproule to be brought up to Law or Medicine, but
this plan for several reasons I have relinquished. Therefore I think some
retail kind of business such as a grocer or being a clerk in an office would be
best suited for him.”
He requests that his son should go to a Commercial School for a year, and he provides money so that Harry can then set up his own business. Samuel cautions his Executors that they must approve
the said business, otherwise Harry is not to be given the money. He adds a brief insight into his view of his
son:
“The youth I
believe possesses upright moral principles but is at present free from any
serious habit.”
The End of the Story
Sadly, we know the end of this story, for it is in the last codicil to Samuel's will. Here Samuel tells us that his reputed son
Harry Robertson Sproule has died, and that his legacy should go to Ann Jane.
Harry died on the
22nd July 1828 in Brighton, England. He was still just 19 years old
and he had died a long way from his home in India.
Those were strange times indeed. Did Samuel do the right thing by Harry? Would he have been better off at home in India? I am sure that Samuel himself pondered on these questions. But what was definitely important to Samuel was to recognise that Harry was a member of his family, a member of our family. Harry Robertson Sproule was my first cousin three times removed, and he belongs in our family tree.
Thanks to FIBIS, Families in British India Society, for their super database which helped in tracing this story.
The story of Samuel is in Samuel Sproule, President of the Medical Board of Bombay
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteinteresting and touching
ReplyDeleteI wonder if Harry's Indian mother died before he left India? So many questions. So many fathers in Samuel's position left (leave) their offspring behind when they returned home. Perhaps he really loved the mother.
ReplyDeleteI descend from a Dr. Godfrey Spruill 1650 - 1718, reputed to be the first doctor in North Carolina. He was supposedly from Stirlingshire, Scotland, but I don't know if that is proven. In any case, I wonder if there's a link between these families.
Hi,
DeleteYes I'm familiar with Godfrey Spruill - interesting family. All Sproules are genetically related - some families are more recently related. These Cowden Sproules who came to Ireland are not closely related to the Godfrey Spruill line.
Regards,
Kate
Thank you,Kate. I will have to pursue my line in Stirlingshire further.
ReplyDelete